MENU
News
  1. Home
  2. Coal Mine Wage Board Decision

Coal Mine Wage Board Decision

Coal Mine Wage Board Decision Ffdegerschlachtde

Coal Mine Wage Board Decision Ffdegerschlachtde

Coal Mine Wage Board Decision. A month later R amp H became a signatory to the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement NBCWA of 1984. On November 16 1987 the United Mine Workers of America Union notified R amp H that it would terminate the NBCWA as allowed by the Agreement on January 31 1988.

Unpublished United States Court Of Appeals

Unpublished United States Court Of Appeals

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD Petitioner v. No. 95-1146 . signatories to the National Coal Wage Agreement of 1988 the Wage Agreement . Article I of the Wage Agreement requires the seller of . 7 The first grievance protests SOCCOs decision to not allow Martinka Mine employees the right to .

87 F3d 1309 Southern Ohio Coal Company V National

87 F3d 1309 Southern Ohio Coal Company V National

Oct 30 1995 1. This case comes before us on direct appeal from a decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board the NLRB . Southern Ohio Coal Company SOCCO petitions for review of the NLRBs final order that SOCCO violated 8a1 and 5 of the National Labor Relations Act the NLRA 29 U.S.C. 158a1 and 51 by refusing to furnish District 31 of the United Mine

Central Wage Board For Coal Mining Industry Escort

Central Wage Board For Coal Mining Industry Escort

Jul 29 2014 Wage boards like their own time in the submission of reports e.g. the second wage board for cement and the first wage board for cotton textiles and sugar took a little less than 3 years; while the wage board for coal mining non journalists jute iron and steel took a little over 3 years; that for tea plantations took 5 .

Carter V Carter Coal Company 1936 Us Conlawpedia

Carter V Carter Coal Company 1936 Us Conlawpedia

Summary. Decided on May 18 1936 Carter v. Carter Coal Company proved to be a significant case on the Supreme Courts docket. The issue at hand dealt with the enactment of the Bituminous Coal Conservation Act of 1935 under one of President Franklin D. Roosevelts many New Deal programs.

A Study Of Coal Arbitration Under The National

A Study Of Coal Arbitration Under The National

share of mining production relative to surface mines from 76.1 of all coal produced in 1950 to 37.9 of the total in 1979. Since organized labor overwhelmingly the United Mine Workers of America dominated only the underground mining industry its share of total bituminous coal pro-

James H Harmon V Consolidation Coal Co

James H Harmon V Consolidation Coal Co

Virginia Coal Mine Safety Board of Appeals. Issues The principal issue in this case is whether or not the complainants removal from the mine safety committee by the respondent was discriminatory under section 105c of the Act. Additional issues raised by the parties are disposed of in the course of this decision.

Ser Wooten Et Al V Coal Mine Safety Board Of Appeals

Ser Wooten Et Al V Coal Mine Safety Board Of Appeals

The Coal Mine Safety Board of Appeals exceeds its legitimate powers when it modifies an order of temporary suspension of a certified persons certificate based upon the imposition of an additional procedural requirement that the Director of the West Virginia Office of Miners Health Safety and Training must make a proper application with the .

Ccase Wilfred Bryant V Dingess Mine

Ccase Wilfred Bryant V Dingess Mine

coal mine located in Logan County West Virginia. On July 20 1982 Mullins the lessee of the coal at the mine entered into a renewable one.year contract with Dingess Mine Service a company solely owned by Joe Dingess and Johnny Dingess Dingess brothers whereby Dingess agreed to mine coal and deliver it to Mullins for a specified sum per

United States V Pewee Coal Co Inc 341 Us 114

United States V Pewee Coal Co Inc 341 Us 114

United States v. Pewee Coal Co. Inc. No. 168. Argued January 2-3 1951. Decided April 30 1951. 341 U.S. 114. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CLAIMS Syllabus. Respondent is a coal mine operator whose property was seized and operated by the United States during a temporary period in 1943 to avert a nationwide strike of miners.

Jewell Ridge Coal Corp V Mine Workers 325 Us 161

Jewell Ridge Coal Corp V Mine Workers 325 Us 161

The Court takes refuge in its own decision in Tennessee Coal Co. v. Muscoda . under a temporary arrangement extending the old contract to May 31. On May 14 the Board directed the Wage Conference to resume negotiations. . As a result of certain investigations which have been conducted by the Wage amp; Hour Division at bituminous coal mines in .

Mined Land Reclamation Board Colorado Division Of

Mined Land Reclamation Board Colorado Division Of

The Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board CMLRB is a multi-interest citizen board which establishes the regulations standards and policies that guide the Division of Reclamation Mining and Safety. The Board was created in 1976 by the Colorado General Assembly. Members are appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the legislature serving terms of 4 years.

Employment Discrimination Utah Labor Commission

Employment Discrimination Utah Labor Commission

About Us The Utah Antidiscrimination and Labor Divisions UALD employment discrimination focus is to administer and enforce the Utah Antidiscrimination Act Utah Code Ann. 34A-5-101 et seq. The Utah Antidiscrimination Act prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of race color religion sex age 40 or over national origin disability sexual orientation gender identity .

Coal Mine Wage Board Decision Ffdegerschlachtde

Coal Mine Wage Board Decision Ffdegerschlachtde

Coal Mine Wage Board Decision. A month later R amp H became a signatory to the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement NBCWA of 1984. On November 16 1987 the United Mine Workers of America Union notified R amp H that it would terminate the NBCWA as allowed by the Agreement on January 31 1988.

Billy Wise Umwa V Consolidation Coal

Billy Wise Umwa V Consolidation Coal

of the Mine Act was misplaced because there was no evidence that the posting of the danger board resulted from a firebossing examination by a certified mine examiner conducted pursuant to that section. 4 FMSHRC at 1334. The UMWA took the position that under the 1981 Coal Wage Agreement Wise was qualified to make mine examinations

Text Of War Labor Board Majority Opinion On Coal Mine

Text Of War Labor Board Majority Opinion On Coal Mine

Text of War Labor Board Majority Opinion on Coal Mine PortaltoPortal Pay. . WASHINGTON June 18 AP -- The War Labor Board decision in the soft-coal wage dispute follows .

Central Wage Board For Coal Mining Industry

Central Wage Board For Coal Mining Industry

in the coal industry are covered under the recommendations of the Central Wage Board for Coal Mining Industry as accepted by the Government of India and made applicable with effect from 15th August 1967. National Coal Wage Agreements were operative as under - NCWA PERIOD SIGNED ON TENURE NCWA-I 01.01.1975 to 31.12.1978 11.12.1974 4 Yrs. Chat Online

Davis V Kitt Energy Corp 1988 Supreme Court Of

Davis V Kitt Energy Corp 1988 Supreme Court Of

KITT ENERGY CORP. v. James L. DAVIS and West Virginia Coal Mine Health amp; Safety Board of Appeals. No. 17668. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. . d of the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement of 1981. . This will enable the Board to consider the decision in the light of Note 21 of Gardner-Denver giving it such weight as it .

Board Lessens Coal Pay Scale; Move For Peace; Weekly Wage

Board Lessens Coal Pay Scale; Move For Peace; Weekly Wage

BOARD LESSENS COAL PAY SCALE; MOVE FOR PEACE; WEEKLY WAGE RISE 7-to-5 Decision Rejects Illinois Pact but It Backs Travel Time OVERTIME KEY TO RULING Striking Miners Are Told to Return by Tomorrow .

Carter V Carter Coal Company 1936 Us Conlawpedia

Carter V Carter Coal Company 1936 Us Conlawpedia

Summary. Decided on May 18 1936 Carter v. Carter Coal Company proved to be a significant case on the Supreme Courts docket. The issue at hand dealt with the enactment of the Bituminous Coal Conservation Act of 1935 under one of President Franklin D. Roosevelts many New Deal programs.

United States V Pewee Coal Co Findlaw

United States V Pewee Coal Co Findlaw

United States Supreme Court. UNITED STATES v. PEWEE COAL CO.1951 No. 168 Argued Decided April 30 1951 Respondent is a coal mine operator whose property was seized and operated by the United States during a temporary period in 1943 to avert a nationwide strike of miners.

The Coal Strike Of 1919 In Indiana County And Its

The Coal Strike Of 1919 In Indiana County And Its

The car pushing issue involved the compensation to coal miners for pushing cars from side areas of the mine to the main track where mechanical power moved the coal cars. More impressive however were the resolutions presented by Local 831 in Ernest which

Mined Land Reclamation Board Colorado Division Of

Mined Land Reclamation Board Colorado Division Of

The Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board CMLRB is a multi-interest citizen board which establishes the regulations standards and policies that guide the Division of Reclamation Mining and Safety. The Board was created in 1976 by the Colorado General Assembly. Members are appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the legislature serving terms of 4 years.

Ernst And Young Denies Inflating Mine Value By  Abc

Ernst And Young Denies Inflating Mine Value By Abc

Mar 02 2021 Ernst and Young EY was engaged by British mining company SIMEC in 2019 to carry out an economic assessment of its plan to expand the Tahmoor coking coal mine south-west of Sydney.

Related News